Posted by: Michael | 03/10/2010

Gratitude Inventory

I just got done listening to a Dhamma talk by Ajahn Munindo about gratitude. In it he recommends taking time to “count our blessings” but rather than simply giving lip service to the idea he advocates actually doing it. I’ve been looking for a way to formally practice the cultivation of gratitude and it would seem that this would be the best way to do it.

1. My mother

2. My father

3. Judy Mazziotti, one of my elementary school teachers.

4. My Uncle Bob (my first dentist)

5. Helen Lette, an aide at my elementary school.

6. Chuck Cordone, my first barber.

7. Jennifer DePalma, my favorite babysitter.

8. Jan Tierney, another favorite babysitter.

9. My grandfather Giovanni.

10. My Grandmother Virginia.

11. My son.

12. My wife.

13. My sister.

14. My Uncle John.

15. My Aunt Betty.

16. My first philosophy professor.

17. All of my teachers.

18. All of my doctors.

19. All of my friends past and present.

20. All of the people who worked to keep the lights on and electricity flowing.

21. Everyone who keeps the buses and trains running in NYC.

22. My employees.

23. My partner.

24. My job.

25. My education.

26. Meeting the Dhamma.

27. Kalyana-mitta.

28. My step-mother.

29. My in-laws.

30. My practice.

31. The Tisarana.

32. The relative peace and security of where I live.

33. This human life.

34. The kindness of others.

35. Generosity.

36. Morality.

37. Truth-telling.

38. Wisdom.

39. Compassion.

40. Love.

I think that’s all I want to list for now as I do feel that it’s becoming a bit forced or contrived. Then again, it always seems to feel like that when I experiment with a new practice. I think I’ll try to list 5 things I am grateful for everyday for the next week and see what happens. Be well!

Posted by: Michael | 03/10/2010

The Simile of the Saw

“Once, monks, in this same Savatthi, there was a lady of a household named Vedehika. This good report about Lady Vedehika had circulated: ‘Lady Vedehika is gentle. Lady Vedehika is even-tempered. Lady Vedehika is calm.’ Now, Lady Vedehika had a slave named Kali who was diligent, deft, & neat in her work. The thought occurred to Kali the slave: ‘This good report about my Lady Vedehika has circulated: “Lady Vedehika is even-tempered. Lady Vedehika is gentle. Lady Vedehika is calm.” Now, is anger present in my lady without showing, or is it absent? Or is it just because I’m diligent, deft, & neat in my work that the anger present in my lady doesn’t show? Why don’t I test her?’

“So Kali the slave got up after daybreak. Then Lady Vedehika said to her: ‘Hey, Kali!’

“‘Yes, madam?’

“‘Why did you get up after daybreak?’

“‘No reason, madam.’

“‘No reason, you wicked slave, and yet you get up after daybreak?’ Angered & displeased, she scowled.

“Then the thought occurred to Kali the slave: ‘Anger is present in my lady without showing, and not absent. And it’s just because I’m diligent, deft, & neat in my work that the anger present in my lady doesn’t show. Why don’t I test her some more?’

“So Kali the slave got up later in the day. Then Lady Vedehika said to her: ‘Hey, Kali!’

“‘Yes, madam?’

“‘Why did you get up later in the day?’

“‘No reason, madam.’

“‘No reason, you wicked slave, and yet you get up later in the day?’ Angered & displeased, she grumbled.

“Then the thought occurred to Kali the slave: ‘Anger is present in my lady without showing, and not absent. And it’s just because I’m diligent, deft, & neat in my work that the anger present in my lady doesn’t show. Why don’t I test her some more?’

“So Kali the slave got up even later in the day. Then Lady Vedehika said to her: ‘Hey, Kali!’

“‘Yes, madam?’

“‘Why did you get up even later in the day?’

“‘No reason, madam.’

“‘No reason, you wicked slave, and yet you get up even later in the day?’ Angered & displeased, she grabbed hold of a rolling pin and gave her a whack over the head, cutting it open.

“Then Kali the slave, with blood streaming from her cut-open head, went and denounced her mistress to the neighbors: ‘See, ladies, the gentle one’s handiwork? See the even-tempered one’s handiwork? See the calm one’s handiwork? How could she, angered & displeased with her only slave for getting up after daybreak, grab hold of a rolling pin and give her a whack over the head, cutting it open?’

“After that this evil report about Lady Vedehika circulated: ‘Lady Vedehika is vicious. Lady Vedehika is foul-tempered. Lady Vedehika is violent.’

In the same way, monks, a monk may be ever so gentle, ever so even-tempered, ever so calm, as long as he is not touched by disagreeable aspects of speech. But it is only when disagreeable aspects of speech touch him that he can truly be known as gentle, even-tempered, & calm. I don’t call a monk easy to admonish if he is easy to admonish and makes himself easy to admonish only by reason of robes, almsfood, lodging, & medicinal requisites for curing the sick. Why is that? Because if he doesn’t get robes, almsfood, lodging, & medicinal requisites for curing the sick, then he isn’t easy to admonish and doesn’t make himself easy to admonish. But if a monk is easy to admonish and makes himself easy to admonish purely out of esteem for the Dhamma, respect for the Dhamma, reverence for the Dhamma, then I call him easy to admonish. Thus, monks, you should train yourselves: ‘We will be easy to admonish and make ourselves easy to admonish purely out of esteem for the Dhamma, respect for the Dhamma, reverence for the Dhamma.’ That’s how you should train yourselves.

“Monks, there are these five aspects of speech by which others may address you: timely or untimely, true or false, affectionate or harsh, beneficial or unbeneficial, with a mind of good-will or with inner hate. Others may address you in a timely way or an untimely way. They may address you with what is true or what is false. They may address you in an affectionate way or a harsh way. They may address you in a beneficial way or an unbeneficial way. They may address you with a mind of good-will or with inner hate. In any event, you should train yourselves: ‘Our minds will be unaffected and we will say no evil words. We will remain sympathetic to that person’s welfare, with a mind of good will, and with no inner hate. We will keep pervading him with an awareness imbued with good will and, beginning with him, we will keep pervading the all-encompassing world with an awareness imbued with good will — abundant, expansive, immeasurable, free from hostility, free from ill will.’ That’s how you should train yourselves.

Suppose that a man were to come along carrying a hoe & a basket, saying, ‘I will make this great earth be without earth.’ He would dig here & there, scatter soil here & there, spit here & there, urinate here & there, saying, ‘Be without earth. Be without earth.’ Now, what do you think — would he make this great earth be without earth?”

“No, lord. Why is that? Because this great earth is deep & enormous. It can’t easily be made to be without earth. The man would reap only a share of weariness & disappointment.”

“In the same way, monks, there are these five aspects of speech by which others may address you: timely or untimely, true or false, affectionate or harsh, beneficial or unbeneficial, with a mind of good-will or with inner hate. Others may address you in a timely way or an untimely way. They may address you with what is true or what is false. They may address you in an affectionate way or a harsh way. They may address you in a beneficial way or an unbeneficial way. They may address you with a mind of good-will or with inner hate. In any event, you should train yourselves: ‘Our minds will be unaffected and we will say no evil words. We will remain sympathetic to that person’s welfare, with a mind of good will, and with no inner hate. We will keep pervading him with an awareness imbued with good will and, beginning with him, we will keep pervading the all-encompassing world with an awareness imbued with good will equal to the great earth — abundant, expansive, immeasurable, free from hostility, free from ill will.’ That’s how you should train yourselves.

Suppose that a man were to come along carrying lac, yellow orpiment, indigo, or crimson, saying, ‘I will draw pictures in space, I will make pictures appear.’ Now, what do you think — would he draw pictures in space & make pictures appear?”

“No, lord. Why is that? Because space is formless & featureless. It’s not easy to draw pictures there and to make them appear. The man would reap only a share of weariness & disappointment.”

“In the same way, monks, there are these five aspects of speech by which others may address you: timely or untimely, true or false, affectionate or harsh, beneficial or unbeneficial, with a mind of good-will or with inner hate. Others may address you in a timely way or an untimely way. They may address you with what is true or what is false. They may address you in an affectionate way or a harsh way. They may address you in a beneficial way or an unbeneficial way. They may address you with a mind of good-will or with inner hate. In any event, you should train yourselves: ‘Our minds will be unaffected and we will say no evil words. We will remain sympathetic to that person’s welfare, with a mind of good will, and with no inner hate. We will keep pervading him with an awareness imbued with good will and, beginning with him, we will keep pervading the all-encompassing world with an awareness imbued with good will equal to space — abundant, expansive, immeasurable, free from hostility, free from ill will.’ That’s how you should train yourselves.

Suppose that a man were to come along carrying a burning grass torch and saying, ‘With this burning grass torch I will heat up the river Ganges and make it boil.’ Now, what do you think — would he, with that burning grass torch, heat up the river Ganges and make it boil?”

“No, lord. Why is that? Because the river Ganges is deep & enormous. It’s not easy to heat it up and make it boil with a burning grass torch. The man would reap only a share of weariness & disappointment.”

“In the same way, monks, there are these five aspects of speech by which others may address you: timely or untimely, true or false, affectionate or harsh, beneficial or unbeneficial, with a mind of good-will or with inner hate. Others may address you in a timely way or an untimely way. They may address you with what is true or what is false. They may address you in an affectionate way or a harsh way. They may address you in a beneficial way or an unbeneficial way. They may address you with a mind of good-will or with inner hate. In any event, you should train yourselves: ‘Our minds will be unaffected and we will say no evil words. We will remain sympathetic to that person’s welfare, with a mind of good will, and with no inner hate. We will keep pervading him with an awareness imbued with good will and, beginning with him, we will keep pervading the all-encompassing world with an awareness imbued with good will equal to the river Ganges — abundant, expansive, immeasurable, free from hostility, free from ill will.’ That’s how you should train yourselves.

Suppose there were a catskin bag — beaten, well-beaten, beaten through & through, soft, silky, free of rustling & crackling — and a man were to come along carrying a stick or shard and saying, ‘With this stick or shard I will take this catskin bag — beaten, well-beaten, beaten through & through, soft, silky, free of rustling & crackling — and I will make it rustle & crackle.’ Now, what do you think — would he, with that stick or shard, take that catskin bag — beaten, well-beaten, beaten through & through, soft, silky, free of rustling & crackling — and make it rustle & crackle?”

“No, lord. Why is that? Because the catskin bag is beaten, well-beaten, beaten through & through, soft, silky, free of rustling & crackling. It’s not easy to make it rustle & crackle with a stick or shard. The man would reap only a share of weariness & disappointment.”

“In the same way, monks, there are these five aspects of speech by which others may address you: timely or untimely, true or false, affectionate or harsh, beneficial or unbeneficial, with a mind of good-will or with inner hate. Others may address you in a timely way or an untimely way. They may address you with what is true or what is false. They may address you in an affectionate way or a harsh way. They may address you in a beneficial way or an unbeneficial way. They may address you with a mind of good-will or with inner hate. In any event, you should train yourselves: ‘Our minds will be unaffected and we will say no evil words. We will remain sympathetic to that person’s welfare, with a mind of good will, and with no inner hate. We will keep pervading him with an awareness imbued with good will and, beginning with him, we will keep pervading the all-encompassing world with an awareness imbued with good will equal to a catskin bag — abundant, expansive, immeasurable, free from hostility, free from ill will.’ That’s how you should train yourselves.

“Monks, even if bandits were to carve you up savagely, limb by limb, with a two-handled saw, he among you who let his heart get angered even at that would not be doing my bidding. Even then you should train yourselves: ‘Our minds will be unaffected and we will say no evil words. We will remain sympathetic, with a mind of good will, and with no inner hate. We will keep pervading these people with an awareness imbued with good will and, beginning with them, we will keep pervading the all-encompassing world with an awareness imbued with good will — abundant, expansive, immeasurable, free from hostility, free from ill will.’ That’s how you should train yourselves.

“Monks, if you attend constantly to this admonition on the simile of the saw, do you see any aspects of speech, slight or gross, that you could not endure?”

“No, lord.”

“Then attend constantly to this admonition on the simile of the saw. That will be for your long-term welfare & happiness.”

That is what the Blessed One said. Gratified, the monks delighted in the Blessed One’s words.

Source:

http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/mn/mn.021x.than.html

Posted by: Michael | 03/09/2010

The Elephant

320. As an elephant in the battlefield withstands arrows shot from bows all around, even so shall I endure abuse. There are many, indeed, who lack virtue.

321. A tamed elephant is led into a crowd, and the king mounts a tamed elephant. Best among men is the subdued one who endures abuse.

These are some of my favorite verses from the Dhammapada and have often inspired me when the going was rough. For whatever reason I have always been enchanted with the idea of developing the parami of khanti (patient forbearance) but always viewed it as if it were in a vacuum. At best, I envisioned the cultivation of patient-forbearance as the step-child of upekkha.  So, I was naturally delighted when I stumbled across the following:

“The Most Venerable Man-lei Sayadaw wrote about these two perfections in his book, The Four Dhammas of Conduct:

Mettāluko khamāsīlo, sabbatthānesu nibbayo,

Paratthatattha micchanto, khantin metteca bhāvaye.

What this means is that the more loving-kindness one can develop, the stronger patience will become, and the more patience a person has, the more loving-kindness he or she will develop.With these two perfections, such a person gains eleven benefits, which are described in the Metta Sutta of the Aṅguttara Nikāya, sutta number 11.16:

One sleeps easily, wakes easily, dreams no evil dreams; one is dear to human beings and dear to non-human beings; the devas protect one; neither fire, poison, nor weapons can touch one; one’s mind gains concentration quickly; one’s complexion is bright; one dies unconfused and — if penetrating no higher — is headed for the Brahma worlds. Without these two perfections, however, one will find it difficult to refrain from anger. As a result, he or she will have many enemies and always be at risk, regardless of time or place. No matter where such a person hides, he will be unable to escape the results of his unwholesome kamma. So if you’ve had enough ‘bad luck’ in your life and want to be free from harm, all you have to do is practice patience and loving-kindness. This is a proven fact that you can experience yourself, if you take the time to put these two perfections into practice.Now, in order to cultivate patient-forbearance and loving-kindness, the first thing we need to understand is that all beings want to be happy. I want to be happy, and you want to be happy.Therefore, if I wish for my own happiness but not for yours, am I being fair to you? Should I not also wish for your happiness? And if I wish for your happiness but not my own, am I being fair to myself? Should I not also wish for my own happiness?”

Eminently practical advice to be sure but we all must admit that it can sometimes seem to be easier said than done. But, upon deeper consideration, what is truly harder? To live a live devoid of the glue of loving-kindness or one in which we meet all beings with gentleness and understanding? Happy uposatha everyone! Be well.

Source:

http://www.dhammaweb.net/ukkamsa/Patience_Dec_26_07.pdf

Posted by: Michael | 03/07/2010

Reconciliation

“These two are fools. Which two? The one who doesn’t see his/her transgression as a transgression, and the one who doesn’t rightfully pardon another who has confessed his/her transgression. These two are fools.

“These two are wise. Which two? The one who sees his/her transgression as a transgression, and the one who rightfully pardons another who has confessed his/her transgression. These two are wise.”

— AN 2.21

I was looking for something that would shed light on what to do on those occasions when you don’t restrain yourself and you say and do things that you immediately know are unskillful. Thanissaro Bhikkhu has a great piece on forgiveness and reconciliation wherein he discusses the differences and similarities between the two. Interestingly, he concludes that although forgiveness can and should be given to anyone art any time, reconciliation is only possible when both parties are willing to let bygones be bygones, admit fault where appropriate and resolve to live in harmony taking care not to repeat the same behaviors that led to discord in the first place. Please find the link to this article here.

One of my favorite suttas and certainly one of the most useful to anyone is the Ambalatthika-rahulovada Sutta: Instructions to Rahula. Here is the full text:

I have heard that on one occasion the Blessed One was staying near , at the Bamboo Grove, the Squirrels’ Feeding Ground.

At that time  was staying at the Mango Stone. Then the Blessed One, arising from his seclusion in the late afternoon, went to where Ven. Rahula was staying at the Mango Stone. Ven. Rahula saw him coming from afar and, on seeing him, set out a seat & water for washing the feet. The Blessed One sat down on the seat set out and, having sat down, washed his feet. Ven. Rahula, bowing down to the Blessed One, sat to one side.

Then the Blessed One, having left a little bit of water in the water dipper, said to Ven. Rahula, “Rahula, do you see this little bit of left-over water remaining in the water dipper?”

“Yes, sir.”

“That’s how little of a contemplative there is in anyone who feels no shame at telling a deliberate lie.”

Having tossed away the little bit of left-over water, the Blessed One said to Ven. Rahula, “Rahula, do you see how this little bit of left-over water is tossed away?”

“Yes, sir.”

“Rahula, whatever there is of a contemplative in anyone who feels no shame at telling a deliberate lie is tossed away just like that.”

Having turned the water dipper upside down, the Blessed One said to Ven. Rahula, “Rahula, do you see how this water dipper is turned upside down?”

“Yes, sir.”

“Rahula, whatever there is of a contemplative in anyone who feels no shame at telling a deliberate lie is turned upside down just like that.”

Having turned the water dipper right-side up, the Blessed One said to Ven. Rahula, “Rahula, do you see how empty & hollow this water dipper is?”

“Yes, sir.”

“Rahula, whatever there is of a contemplative in anyone who feels no shame at telling a deliberate lie is empty & hollow just like that.

“Rahula, it’s like a royal elephant: immense, pedigreed, accustomed to battles, its tusks like chariot poles. Having gone into battle, it uses its forefeet & hindfeet, its forequarters & hindquarters, its head & ears & tusks & tail, but keeps protecting its trunk. The elephant trainer notices that and thinks, ‘This royal elephant has not given up its life to the king.’ But when the royal elephant… having gone into battle, uses its forefeet & hindfeet, its forequarters & hindquarters, its head & ears & tusks & tail & his trunk, the trainer notices that and thinks, ‘This royal elephant has given up its life to the king. There is nothing it will not do.’

“In the same way, Rahula, when anyone feels no shame in telling a deliberate lie, there is no evil, I tell you, he will not do. Thus, Rahula, you should train yourself, ‘I will not tell a deliberate lie even in jest.’

“What do you think, Rahula: What is a mirror for?”

“For reflection, sir.”

“In the same way, Rahula, bodily actions, verbal actions, & mental actions are to be done with repeated reflection.

“Whenever you want to do a bodily action, you should reflect on it: ‘This bodily action I want to do — would it lead to self-affliction, to the affliction of others, or to both? Would it be an unskillful bodily action, with painful consequences, painful results?’ If, on reflection, you know that it would lead to self-affliction, to the affliction of others, or to both; it would be an unskillful bodily action with painful consequences, painful results, then any bodily action of that sort is absolutely unfit for you to do. But if on reflection you know that it would not cause affliction… it would be a skillful bodily action with pleasant consequences, pleasant results, then any bodily action of that sort is fit for you to do.

“While you are doing a bodily action, you should reflect on it: ‘This bodily action I am doing — is it leading to self-affliction, to the affliction of others, or to both? Is it an unskillful bodily action, with painful consequences, painful results?’ If, on reflection, you know that it is leading to self-affliction, to the affliction of others, or to both… you should give it up. But if on reflection you know that it is not… you may continue with it.

“Having done a bodily action, you should reflect on it: ‘This bodily action I have done — did it lead to self-affliction, to the affliction of others, or to both? Was it an unskillful bodily action, with painful consequences, painful results?’ If, on reflection, you know that it led to self-affliction, to the affliction of others, or to both; it was an unskillful bodily action with painful consequences, painful results, then you should confess it, reveal it, lay it open to the Teacher or to a knowledgeable companion in the holy life. Having confessed it… you should exercise restraint in the future. But if on reflection you know that it did not lead to affliction… it was a skillful bodily action with pleasant consequences, pleasant results, then you should stay mentally refreshed & joyful, training day & night in skillful mental qualities.

“Whenever you want to do a verbal action, you should reflect on it: ‘This verbal action I want to do — would it lead to self-affliction, to the affliction of others, or to both? Would it be an unskillful verbal action, with painful consequences, painful results?’ If, on reflection, you know that it would lead to self-affliction, to the affliction of others, or to both; it would be an unskillful verbal action with painful consequences, painful results, then any verbal action of that sort is absolutely unfit for you to do. But if on reflection you know that it would not cause affliction… it would be a skillful verbal action with pleasant consequences, pleasant results, then any verbal action of that sort is fit for you to do.

“While you are doing a verbal action, you should reflect on it: ‘This verbal action I am doing — is it leading to self-affliction, to the affliction of others, or to both? Is it an unskillful verbal action, with painful consequences, painful results?’ If, on reflection, you know that it is leading to self-affliction, to the affliction of others, or to both… you should give it up. But if on reflection you know that it is not… you may continue with it.

“Having done a verbal action, you should reflect on it: ‘This verbal action I have done — did it lead to self-affliction, to the affliction of others, or to both? Was it an unskillful verbal action, with painful consequences, painful results?’ If, on reflection, you know that it led to self-affliction, to the affliction of others, or to both; it was an unskillful verbal action with painful consequences, painful results, then you should confess it, reveal it, lay it open to the Teacher or to a knowledgeable companion in the holy life. Having confessed it… you should exercise restraint in the future. But if on reflection you know that it did not lead to affliction… it was a skillful verbal action with pleasant consequences, pleasant results, then you should stay mentally refreshed & joyful, training day & night in skillful mental qualities.

“Whenever you want to do a mental action, you should reflect on it: ‘This mental action I want to do — would it lead to self-affliction, to the affliction of others, or to both? Would it be an unskillful mental action, with painful consequences, painful results?’ If, on reflection, you know that it would lead to self-affliction, to the affliction of others, or to both; it would be an unskillful mental action with painful consequences, painful results, then any mental action of that sort is absolutely unfit for you to do. But if on reflection you know that it would not cause affliction… it would be a skillful mental action with pleasant consequences, pleasant results, then any mental action of that sort is fit for you to do.

“While you are doing a mental action, you should reflect on it: ‘This mental action I am doing — is it leading to self-affliction, to the affliction of others, or to both? Is it an unskillful mental action, with painful consequences, painful results?’ If, on reflection, you know that it is leading to self-affliction, to the affliction of others, or to both… you should give it up. But if on reflection you know that it is not… you may continue with it.

“Having done a mental action, you should reflect on it: ‘This mental action I have done — did it lead to self-affliction, to the affliction of others, or to both? Was it an unskillful mental action, with painful consequences, painful results?’ If, on reflection, you know that it led to self-affliction, to the affliction of others, or to both; it was an unskillful mental action with painful consequences, painful results, then you should feel distressed, ashamed, & disgusted with it. Feeling distressed, ashamed, & disgusted with it, you should exercise restraint in the future. But if on reflection you know that it did not lead to affliction… it was a skillful mental action with pleasant consequences, pleasant results, then you should stay mentally refreshed & joyful, training day & night in skillful mental qualities.

“Rahula, all those brahmans & contemplatives in the course of the past who purified their bodily actions, verbal actions, & mental actions, did it through repeated reflection on their bodily actions, verbal actions, & mental actions in just this way.

“All those brahmans & contemplatives in the course of the future who will purify their bodily actions, verbal actions, & mental actions, will do it through repeated reflection on their bodily actions, verbal actions, & mental actions in just this way.

“All those brahmans & contemplatives at present who purify their bodily actions, verbal actions, & mental actions, do it through repeated reflection on their bodily actions, verbal actions, & mental actions in just this way.

“Thus, Rahula, you should train yourself: ‘I will purify my bodily actions through repeated reflection. I will purify my verbal actions through repeated reflection. I will purify my mental actions through repeated reflection.’ That’s how you should train yourself.”

That is what the Blessed One said. Gratified, Ven. Rahula delighted in the Blessed One’s words.

Notes

1.
Rahula: the Buddha’s son, who according to the Commentary was seven years old when this discourse was delivered to him.
2.
Samañña. Throughout ancient cultures, the terminology of music was used to describe the moral quality of people and actions. Discordant intervals or poorly-tuned musical instruments were metaphors for evil; harmonious intervals and well-tuned instruments, metaphors for good. In Pali, the term sama — “even” — described an instrument tuned on-pitch. There is a famous passage (in AN 6.55) where the Buddha reminds Sona Kolivisa — who had been over-exerting himself in the practice — that a lute sounds appealing only if the strings are neither too taut or too lax, but “evenly” tuned. This image would have special resonances with the Buddha’s teaching on the middle way. It also adds meaning to the term samana — monk or contemplative — which the texts frequently mention as being derived fromsama. The word samañña — “evenness,” the quality of being in tune — also means the quality of being a contemplative: The true contemplative is always in tune with what is proper and good.

Source:

http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/mn/mn.061.than.html

Posted by: Michael | 03/07/2010

Devotion

It’s not often that, at least in Vipassana/Theravada circles, one hears much about devotion. It’s my opinion, however, that my practice would have never truly taken root had it not become more than a purely intellectual pursuit. For years now, I begin my day with a morning puja-bowing three times before a Buddha-rupa while reciting Namo tassa bhagavato arahato samma sambuddhassa then taking the refuges and precepts. I cannot emphasize enough how strongly I feel that faith and confidence in the Buddha a the supreme teacher of gods and men is a requisite on the path but, in the end, that’s just my personal opinion.

But, you may be asking, what does this have to do with the brahma viharas? As I have alluded to several times now, the cultivation of gratitude seems to me to be part and parcel of the development of mudita or, at the very least, provisional in its development. Following this logic, to whom should we have more gratitude than the Lord Buddha? I often begin my cultivation of gratitude by reflection on the blessings of the Buddha, Dhamma and Sangha and, in fact, Buddhanussati is one of the 40 traditional meditation themes outlined in the Visuddhimagga and is even cited in the suttas.

“When a noble disciple contemplates upon the Enlightened One, at that time his mind is not enwrapped in lust, nor in hatred, nor in delusion. At such a time his mind is rightly directed towards the Perfect One (Tathagata). And with a rightly directed mind the noble disciple gains enthusiasm for the goal, enthusiasm for the Dhamma, gains the delight derived from the Dhamma. In him thus delighted, joy arises; to one who is joyful, body and mind become calm; calmed in body and mind, he feels at ease; and if at ease, the mind finds concentration. Such a one is called a noble disciple who among humanity gone wrong, has attained to what is right; who among a humanity beset by troubles, dwells free of troubles.”

— AN 6.10

So, although recollection of the Buddha and devotional practices may not be, themselves, practices which directly cultivate the brahma viharas we can certainly develop our faculties of gratitude and appreciation by frequently reflecting on the virtues and good qualities of the Tiratana.  May you be well, happy and peaceful!

Posted by: Michael | 03/06/2010

The PDF on Gratitude I Promised

And I’ve finally located the great little booklet on gratitude in the teachings of the Lord Buddha and it may be found here:

http://www.beyondthenet.net/thedway/nyanadassana-ebooks/gratitude%20in%20the%20buddhas%20teaching.pdf

I wish I had the energy but I wanted to be sure that I linked to this material before it was forgotten forever.

Posted by: Michael | 03/05/2010

Gratitude

I found the perfect PDF about gratitude earlier today but then an employee quit and I’ve spent the rest of the day being grateful to those who haven’t yet done so and cleaning up the mess left behind.  I include here some short suttas on the importance of gratitude and will try to post what I had intended tomorrow.

“Monks, I will teach you the level of a person of no integrity and the level of a person of integrity. Listen & pay close attention. I will speak.”

“As you say, lord,” the monks responded.

The Blessed One said: “Now what is the level of a person of no integrity? A person of no integrity is ungrateful, doesn’t acknowledge the help given to him. This ingratitude, this lack of acknowledgment is second nature among rude people. It is entirely on the level of a person of no integrity.

“A person of integrity is grateful & acknowledges the help given to him. This gratitude, this acknowledgment is second nature among fine people. It is entirely on the level of a person of integrity.

{II,iv,2} “I tell you, monks, there are two people who are not easy to repay. Which two? Your mother & father. Even if you were to carry your mother on one shoulder & your father on the other shoulder for 100 years, and were to look after them by anointing, massaging, bathing, & rubbing their limbs, and they were to defecate & urinate right there [on your shoulders], you would not in that way pay or repay your parents. If you were to establish your mother & father in absolute sovereignty over this great earth, abounding in the seven treasures, you would not in that way pay or repay your parents. Why is that? Mother & father do much for their children. They care for them, they nourish them, they introduce them to this world. But anyone who rouses his unbelieving mother & father, settles & establishes them in conviction; rouses his unvirtuous mother & father, settles & establishes them in virtue; rouses his stingy mother & father, settles & establishes them in generosity; rouses his foolish mother & father, settles & establishes them in discernment: To this extent one pays & repays one’s mother & father.”

Source:

http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/an/an02/an02.031.than.html

Posted by: Michael | 03/03/2010

The Difficult Person

It should come as no surprise that, from time to time, even our nearest and dearest ones can slip from the heights to which we’ve elevated them and behave (or at least, appear to behave) as if they were our worst enemies. I have often taken comfort in and attempted to put into practice the advice given in the following short sutta from the Anguttara Nikaya which takes as its subject the five ways of removing annoyance.

Bhikkhus, there are these five ways of removing annoyance, by which annoyance can be entirely removed by a bhikkhu when it arises in him. What are the five?

Loving-kindness can be maintained in being towards a person with whom you are annoyed: this is how annoyance with him can be removed.

Compassion can be maintained in being towards a person with whom you are annoyed; this too is how annoyance with him can be removed.

Onlooking equanimity can be maintained in being towards a person with whom you are annoyed; this too is how annoyance with him can be removed.

The forgetting and ignoring of a person with whom you are annoyed can be practiced; this too is how annoyance with him can be removed.

Ownership of deeds in a person with whom you are annoyed can be concentrated upon thus: “This good person is owner of his deeds, heir to his deeds, his deeds are the womb from which he is born, his deeds are his kin for whom he is responsible, his deeds are his refuge, he is heir to his deeds, be they good or bad.” This too is how annoyance with him can be removed.

These are the five ways of removing annoyance, by which annoyance can be entirely removed in a bhikkhu when it arises in him.
-AN 5.161

Rather than simply thinking about it I actually took half an hour last night to apply the advice of this sutta and found, much to my delight, that it really worked. Why I should be surprised at the efficacy of Buddha-vacana is itself surprising but I am continually awestruck by the clarity of the Buddha’s vision and his ability as a teacher.

In brief, I first spent some time reflecting on the fact that everything that happens to me is the result of my own actions so any “mistreatment” I may be receiving is the ripening of kammic seeds. Secondly I reflected that the person who spoke to me harshly will, them-self, have to bear the consequences of their actions. From that point I was able to develop compassion for the suffering they will surely endure and must be feeling in order to feel that they needed to lash out. Once I had established a base of compassionate concern it was easy enough to move onto to metta for them and, finally, from there to mudita.

Posted by: Michael | 03/02/2010

Treating Oneself with Kindness

I tried out a new phrase yesterday which placed more emphasis on the idea that metta is more a doing than a being. Despite how I made feel about myself, or anyone else for that matter, the phrase “May I treat myself with kindness” really helped to place an emphasis on that aspect of metta.  This particular turn of phrase also helped to get me through a difficult morning as it seems to be a formulation lying somewhere between metta and karuna.  I’ve been having a rough couple of weeks with my metta practice and haven’t really been able to feel much of anything for the last several days especially. It seems to me that, when everything feels flat I need to re-focus on self-metta to remind myself of the reason for the practice: true happiness.

“Significantly, when we do metta practice, we begin by directing metta toward ourselves. This is the essential foundation for being able to offer genuine love to others. When we truly love ourselves, we want to take care of others, because that is what is most enriching, or nourishing, for us. When we have a genuine inner life, we are intimate with ourselves and intimate with others. The insight into our inner world allows us to connect to everything around us, so that we can see quite clearly the oneness of all that lives. We see that all beings want to be happy, and that this impulse unites us. We can recognize the rightness and beauty of our common urge towards happiness, and realize intimacy in this shared urge.”

May we all be well, happy and peaceful.

Source:

http://www.vipassana.com/meditation/facets_of_metta.php

Posted by: Michael | 03/01/2010

Bitterness and Resentment

This morning, despite having woken up at 5:00AM I was still unable to meditate for more than two minutes as my toddler decided that he’d wake up as well and my wife informed me that she needed to sleep. I was immediately struck by just how bitter and resentful I was while simultaneously realizing that all of this was due to my kamma or, if you like, the choices I had made to bring me to this point. Equanimity

is characterized as promoting the aspect of neutrality towards beings. Its function is to see equality in beings. It is manifested as the quieting of resentment and approval. Its proximate cause is seeing ownership of deeds (kamma)…It succeeds when it makes resentment and approval subside, and it fails when it produces the equanimity of unknowing, which is that [worldly-minded indifference or ignorance] based on the house life.
Equanimity balances the other three, leads to a deeper understanding of the doctrine of kamma (volitional activity), and ensures mettā, compassion and sympathetic joy are developed equally towards all beings. Equanimity is the key concept that informs my understanding of compassion.

I can’t explain why the realization only hit me today but when I reflect on the fact that my own actions bring me the circumstances in which I find myself there is simply no excuse to indulge in bitterness or self-pity.

Source:

http://www.buddhistethics.org/14/frakes-article.pdf

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

Categories

Brightening Futures of Zanzibar

Improving Lives through Generosity

Shillelagh Studies

A hub for the music, culture, knowledge, and practice of Irish stick-fighting, past and present.